九一星空无限

ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Up next
ZB

Teen who gave underage girl drugs before unlawful sex too young to be jailed

Author
Belinda Feek,
Publish Date
Wed, 12 Mar 2025, 8:39pm
Julio Gomez was sentenced to six months' community detention, 12 months' supervision, and ordered to pay $1500 emotional harm reparation.
Julio Gomez was sentenced to six months' community detention, 12 months' supervision, and ordered to pay $1500 emotional harm reparation.

Teen who gave underage girl drugs before unlawful sex too young to be jailed

Author
Belinda Feek,
Publish Date
Wed, 12 Mar 2025, 8:39pm

A 17-year-old who plied an underage girl with cannabis, before forcing himself on her on five occasions, has avoided a jail sentence as he was not an adult at the time.

Julio Gomez was initially facing two charges of rape, along with charges of sexual connection with a young person, after five incidents involving the 15-year-old victim between September and December, 2022.

The now 20-year-old admitted the two sexual connection charges but defended the two more serious charges until a resolution was made with the Crown prosecutor and the charges were all reduced to sexual connection, which he then pleaded guilty to.

Rape has a 20-year maximum while the sexual connection has a 10-year maximum.

Gomez was sentenced on the five charges in the Hamilton District Court today, where Judge Philip Crayton explained that he couldn鈥檛 send him to jail by law due to his age at the time.

鈥淎s a result you are not liable to be jailed whatever the view the judge takes of the gravity [of offending] and whatever the start point would be, had you been slightly older,鈥 the judge explained at the start of his sentencing.

Gomez was sentenced to six months' community detention, the maximum, 12 months' supervision, and ordered to pay $1500 emotional harm reparation.

鈥楾hat鈥檚 my boy'

Gomez wasn鈥檛 alone in his sexual offending against the girl. A co-offender, CJ Sampiano, was sentenced in December 2023 to 10 months鈥 home detention for his offending.

He forced the victim to perform oral sex on him then filmed her having sex with Gomez in the backseat of a car. He encouraged him, saying 鈥済et into it鈥 and 鈥渢hat鈥檚 my boy鈥.

Gomez first met the girl in September 2022 and he and two others picked her up from her friend鈥檚 house and drove her to Hamilton Lake.

They socialised together in a carpark, and Gomez dropped her friend home, but he asked the victim to stay with him and his two co-offenders.

He drove her to Callum Brae park, reclined her seat right back, and the pair lay either side. They all smoked cannabis and the victim began to feel intoxicated by it.

Gomez began stroking the girl鈥檚 hair, as a co-offender held her shoulders down and after the pair laughed, he then had sexual intercourse with her as she was held down.

His co-offender also had sex with her before they dropped her home.

The similar scenario happened three more times, with the victim being plied with cannabis, and on occasions she unsuccessfully tried to push Gomez off her.

鈥楻eparation won鈥檛 quantify the harm'

Judge Crayton said there were 鈥渁 number of significant aggravating features鈥, including the high degree of pre-meditation, reflected by the location and use of cannabis, and she was vulnerable due to her age and state of drug intoxication and the fact there were three offenders and she was alone.

There were also five incidents, elements of degradation and demeaning behaviour by the use of cellphones.

No contraception was used.

If Gomez was older, Judge Crayton said he would have taken a three-and-a-half to four-year starting point.

Instead, he took into account that Gomez had not appeared in court before and was young. He鈥檇 been on electronically-monitored bail since January last year and there鈥檇 been no issues.

He was also now in a relationship and expecting his first child.

鈥淵ou are able to have imposed on you community detention and supervision.

鈥淭he community detention will provide a punitive aspect and supervision will provide, it鈥檚 hoped a framework ... so that there are no more victims as you become a father.鈥

The next issue was reparation.

Gomez鈥檚 counsel Glen Prentice was concerned that any payment would be 鈥渄rip-fed鈥 as his client wasn鈥檛 working and on a benefit, so it could lead to re-victimisation.

鈥淭hat鈥檚 probably worse, sir,鈥 Prentice said.

However, while the judge agreed, he ordered a $1500 payment be made and hoped it would instead remind Gomez of his actions each time the money came out.

鈥淚t can never quantify the harm, but it is a form of reparation that can only be a token.鈥

Belinda Feek is an Open Justice reporter based in Waikato. She has worked at 九一星空无限 for 10 years and has been a journalist for 20.

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you