data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b11b3/b11b3b838ee0fee84b245b7ea189cfe633f1457e" alt="Photo / Thinkstock"
Two high-achieving students at separate high schools claim they were wrongly accused of cheating and flunked crucial assessments after teachers judged artificial intelligence had completed their work.
But both girls are adamant their work is their own, with one parent describing the use of AI by teachers in the grading process as 鈥淩ussian roulette鈥�.
Experts also warn the use of聽聽to detect plagiarism is dangerous and has potential legal implications, while the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA) emphasises that human teacher judgment remains the best assessment tool.
, released in November last year, is an artificial intelligence chatbot that generates text.
The students failed written assessments after teachers at Cambridge High School and Pukekohe High School flagged an issue with their work and used AI tech for a second opinion.
The Year 13 student at Pukekohe High claims she was also dismissed by her teachers when she tried to show them the background work she did to complete the assignment.
鈥淸The teacher] said you鈥檝e definitely used AI and then they left it at that, so my mum had to ask for the meeting,鈥� the student told the聽Herald.
In the meeting, as she tried to show her notes, pictures of the board, proofreading and other evidence, the student claimed the teacher repeatedly said, 鈥淎I can generate all of that too鈥�.
鈥淚t just really put me down because they didn鈥檛 even want to hear me out or anything,鈥� the student said. 鈥淚 can鈥檛 lie, I cried a lot.鈥�
The student, who wants to study medical imaging at university next year, is now concerned about how a failed grade because of alleged cheating might affect her chances of being accepted into the course.
Her mum said her daughter is heartbroken at the allegation.
鈥淪he is a good student, she鈥檚 never been in trouble, never been called into question ever for anything,鈥� the mum said. 鈥淪he studies really hard and she鈥檚 always had merits and excellence on all exams and internals.鈥�
Pukekohe High School principal Richard Barnett said teachers will speak to students about their level of understanding to see if it correlates with the written understanding of a finished assignment.
Barnett said his staff, who 鈥渒now their students individually鈥�, make judgments on which work needs additional scrutiny.
Cambridge High School principal Greg Thornton also said: 鈥淲e review each student鈥檚 work using teacher judgment. Only the scripts that are not considered to potentially be a student鈥檚 own work are further investigated.鈥�
Thornton said teacher judgment involved looking at the students鈥� previous work and their 鈥渙verall performance鈥� in class.
The Cambridge student鈥檚 mother told the聽贬别谤补濒诲听her daughter has never failed an NCEA assessment before.
鈥淪he got endorsed with excellence last year,鈥� she said, questioning why her daughter鈥檚 work was flagged.
鈥淧eople take [the software] as gospel and it鈥檚 not. It鈥檚 full of falsehood and made-up information.
鈥淢y issue with it all is that if this is how schools are checking work it鈥檚 just ridiculous when we know that ChatGPT - everything I鈥檝e read about it says that it鈥檚 unreliable, it鈥檚 inconsistent.鈥�
The mother described the use of AI technology to help grade school work as like 鈥淩ussian roulette鈥�.
Thornton said he wouldn鈥檛 comment on the specific case at his school, but said he was 鈥渆ngaging with [the student] in accordance with our concerns and complaints procedure鈥�.
鈥淲e are in line with NZQA expectations to follow principles of natural justice when investigating possible cases of plagiarism,鈥� Thornton said.
NZQA advised schools about the use of artificial intelligence in February - noting the arrival of ChatGPT was ringing alarm bells in the education sector.
鈥淎t worst, the chatbot can produce quality essays, reports, etc on any topic, which might escape detection by regular plagiarism checks and be passed off as the student鈥檚 work,鈥� NZQA said.
NZQA lists three programmes schools could use to detect plagiarism - AI Writing Check, AICheatCheck and Turnitin - which have already been used in schools and universities.
But NZQA also said it could be 鈥渘igh on impossible鈥� to stop students from using AI tech.
NZQA deputy chief executive of assessment Jann Marshall said they don鈥檛 tell schools exactly how they should check whether work was authentic.
鈥淲hile AI detection tools are developing quickly and can be useful, they are not infallible,鈥� Marshall said.
鈥楢 technological revolution鈥� - experts weigh in
Educational technologist Francis Valintine told the聽Herald聽it is entering a dangerous environment if education authorities begin accusing people of using AI to cheat when it isn鈥檛 always accurate.
鈥淭here is no 100 per cent certainty on any tool whatsoever and nobody is claiming to have that magic tool,鈥� Valintine said.
She said the accusations present a 鈥渟ignificant legal challenge鈥� in countries that are banning the technology completely, not just in schooling.
鈥淭here is no way of validating or verifying unless someone has literally seen it and is able to go back to your search and find the use of GPT unless you don鈥檛 clear your history,鈥� Valentine said.
鈥淏ut if you went in and there was no history and someone saying, 鈥業 didn鈥檛 do it鈥�, you鈥檇 be a very brave person [to] turn around and say on a legal constraint or a legal kind of territory, 鈥業 think this is plagiarised and therefore you have not passed鈥�.鈥�
Principal investigator of the Research on Academic Integrity in New Zealand (Rainz) Project and University of Auckland Associate Professor Jason Stephens has researched cheating for two decades.
He said with AI tools now readily available, 鈥渢he opportunity for cheating and all manner of misconduct is seemingly endless鈥�.
He discussed that to combat the risk of inauthenticity within schooling, students must document their work and work process.
鈥淭he problem we face as educators is that AI tools seemed to have arrived overnight. This isn鈥檛 just a technological development, it鈥檚 a technological revolution,鈥� Stephens said.
鈥淚n education, this means rethinking not only how we teach and assess learning, but what we are teaching and assessing for.鈥�
In a recent survey conducted by the Rainz project headed by Stephens of more than 5000 tertiary students at seven universities in NZ, 13.9 per cent of students indicated they had used an artificial intelligence tool to complete academic work.
鈥淕iven that we conducted this survey last year, before the release of ChatGPT, we can expect this number to increase in the year ahead,鈥� Stephens said.
Valintine and Stephens also spoke about harnessing the use of AI for students and teachers alike as an ally, rather than working against it.
When the聽贬别谤补濒诲听asked ChatGPT - directly - if it could detect whether work was plagiarised, the computer programme offered this response: 鈥淚 can certainly help detect plagiarism in a piece of writing.鈥�
鈥淗owever,鈥� it continued, 鈥渋t鈥檚 important to note that I don鈥檛 have access to every possible source of information, so my analysis might not be exhaustive. Additionally, while I can flag passages that match other sources, it鈥檚 ultimately up to a human evaluator to determine whether or not the similarities constitute plagiarism.鈥�
Independent research conducted by聽Herald聽reporters on personal essays and essays completed by students that were identified as AI and AI-generated came back with inconsistent results.
Many essays not AI-generated came back as 鈥渓ikely鈥� to be bot-created. Additionally, it was relatively easy to trick the AI checkers to believe essays were not AI written when they were.
- Raphael Franks聽and聽Rachel Maher, NZH
Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you
Get the iHeart App
Get more of the radio, music and podcasts you love with the FREE iHeartRadio app. Scan the QR code to download now.
Download from the app stores
Stream unlimited music, thousands of radio stations and podcasts all in one app. iHeartRadio is easy to use and all FREE