九一星空无限

ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Up next
ZB

'I can rent it to anyone I want': Builder censured for letting tenants live in shed

Author
Sandra Conchie,
Publish Date
Tue, 3 Sep 2024, 7:07am
John Murray Addison was convicted for allowing this implement shed to be used as a dwelling. The image has been edited for privacy. Photo / Bay of Plenty Regional Council
John Murray Addison was convicted for allowing this implement shed to be used as a dwelling. The image has been edited for privacy. Photo / Bay of Plenty Regional Council

'I can rent it to anyone I want': Builder censured for letting tenants live in shed

Author
Sandra Conchie,
Publish Date
Tue, 3 Sep 2024, 7:07am

Aself-employed听Te Puke听builder twice convicted for allowing an implement shed to be lived in without resource consent has been censured by the Building Practitioners Board.

The board described John Murray Addison as taking a 鈥渃avalier response鈥 to its investigation and showing a 鈥渄isregard for regulation鈥.

Addison was granted consent to build the 167sqm implement shed with a lunchroom, toilet and hand basin on his lifestyle property in 2008.

The听Bay of Plenty Times听previously reported he had been听prosecuted twice by the Western Bay of Plenty District Council听for allowing people to live in the shed, resulting in Environment Court fines of nearly $7900 in 2010 and nearly $29,000 in December last year.

In December he was also convicted by Chief Environment Court Judge David Kirkpatrick of breaching a 2010 order not to use the shed as a dwelling without resource consent. The offence carries a maximum penalty of two years in prison.

As a result of the 2023 conviction, the Building Practitioners Board launched an inquiry into Addison鈥檚 fitness to carry out or supervise building work.

鈥業 can rent it to anyone I want鈥

The board鈥檚 recent written decision said Addison was invited to give a written response to the board鈥檚 disciplinary inquiry.

The decision reported that instead, Addison told the investigator he was unsure why the board had opened the complaint against him, and that: 鈥淚t has nothing to do with JMA Construction Limited, it is a trust where the shed is on, and I can rent it to anyone I want, and it has nothing to do with you guys鈥.

The investigator described Addison 鈥渁s having a displeased tone of voice and using 鈥榮trong negative language鈥欌.

The board noted Addison initially told the council during the second investigation the shed was 鈥渏ust being used as a smoko room鈥 but later said he had tenants and thought the rules had changed to make this 鈥渁lright鈥.

The board said it was satisfied it had 鈥渟ufficient evidence鈥 including Judge Kirkpatrick鈥檚 sentencing notes to decide that Addison鈥檚 conduct had breached Section 317 of the Building Act and censuring him was the appropriate penalty.

A censure is a 鈥渇ormal expression of disapproval鈥. It was among the lesser disciplinary options the board could take under the Act against any licensed building practitioner convicted of an offence punishable by six months鈥 or more imprisonment if it was satisfied the offence reflected badly on fitness for building work.

鈥楢 disregard for regulation鈥

The board said while Addison鈥檚 conduct was at the 鈥渓ower end of criminal offending鈥, his belief that he could still rent the shed as a dwelling and lack of insight into his offending after two prosecutions showed a 鈥渃oncerning pattern鈥 of non-compliance.

And given Addison鈥檚 鈥渃avalier response鈥 to its inquiry, the board said it was 鈥渘ot convinced鈥 he could be trusted to meet the duties expected of a licensed building practitioner, which included complying with an extensive code of ethics.

鈥淭here is a pattern to the respondent鈥檚 behaviour which demonstrates a disregard for regulation. This is not an acceptable attitude for a licensed building practitioner and the public should be aware of the respondent鈥檚 behaviour.鈥

In censuring Addison, the board said from a licensing perspective there was an 鈥渦nacceptable risk鈥 concerning the need to protect the public, maintain public confidence, and minimise the risk of future misconduct or harm鈥 to the licensed building practitioner regime.

These factors, combined with Addison鈥檚 convictions, meant he was 鈥渘ot a fit person鈥 and 鈥渞eflected adversely鈥 on his fitness to carry out or supervise building work or building inspection work.

The board decided to censure Addison and ordered him to pay costs of $875.

The board said its disciplinary decision would be recorded in the Register of Licensed Building Practitioners for three years.

Sandra Conchie听is a senior journalist at the听Bay of Plenty Times听and听Rotorua Daily Post听who has been a journalist for 24 years. She covers mainly police, court and other justice stories, as well as general news. She has been a Canon Media Awards regional/community reporter of the year.

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you