The Police Association says a gang patch ban in the home for repeat offenders will be 鈥渃onfrontational鈥 and 鈥渋ntrusive鈥 - and police do not have the resources for routine searches.
The Ministry of Justice has also warned a residential ban would amount to a "disproportionate penalty" - viewing it wasn鈥檛 appropriate to apply a prohibition order used for firearms, to gang insignia.
Set to pass its Third Reading in the House later today, the Gangs Bill gives police new tools to crack down on gangs - including the power to disperse gatherings and ban patches in public.
But a clause added last month would see a person convicted of publicly displaying gang insignia three times in five years subject to a gang insignia prohibition order - making it illegal for a patch to be present where they live, even if it's not theirs.
This week a second eleventh-hour change was made, which would amend the definition of a 鈥減ublic place鈥 to include gang insignia displayed inside a private vehicle which is visible to the public.
Labour鈥檚 Duncan Webb has called the Gang Patch ban a 鈥渉orrendous piece of legislation鈥, and an 鈥渆xtraordinary intrusion into someone鈥檚 personal life.鈥
But Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith says the Government makes no apologies for introducing 鈥渢ough legislation鈥 to combat gangs.
The Law Society has also objected to the amendment, and to the fact it was added after the Select Committee process - where experts and the public can have their say.
Police Association President Chris Cahill said the gang insignia prohibition order is a 鈥渂ig step鈥 but a 鈥渢wo-edged sword鈥, saying it may be challenging to enforce.
鈥淭hat might work as a prevention measure, but police going into gang homes and associate's homes looking for gang regalia will be confrontational.
鈥淪earch warrants like that are certainly intrusive in someone's privacy so it could increase the tensions.鈥
He said what he is most interested to hear is the expectations of Police officers, in enforcing the order 鈥 saying Police aren鈥檛 resourced to conduct routine searches.
"To do a gang warrant, there's quite a risk assessment that needs to be done and quite a lot of paperwork, and then you can't just wander in with one or two officers, because of the risk it could present.
鈥淭hese are going to be significant operations ... they won't be routine by any stretch of the imagination.鈥
Mark Mitchell says he does not accept that the laws could inflame tensions. He's also previously pushed back on Cahill's concerns about Police resources in enforcing the gang patch ban.
"The police have got the resources, they have got the ability to be able to deal with gangs," he told Mike Hosking this month.
"I completely totally back them and this legislation is going to give them the powers they need to continue to enforce and let the public know our police are controlling the streets and not the gangs.鈥
The Government has committed to delivering 500 extra police officers within its first two years in office, and this year announced a specialized National Gang Unit.
In June the Ministry briefed Goldsmith on escalating penalties for the ban on gang insignia in public - saying it had been instructed to work with Police on options.
Police wanted a ban that would "prevent a person from residing at a residence where gang insignia are present for more than two days (whether consecutive or not) in any 12-month period.鈥
But the Ministry cautioned against this, saying it would be a 鈥渄isproportionate penalty,鈥 particularly when compared to a similar residential restriction in the Firearm Prohibition Order (FPO).
"Justice does not consider it appropriate for this to be carried over for the gang insignia regime, as the risk associated with a person subject to an FPO having ready access to firearms is not comparable to that posed by access to gang insignia."
It also warned it would "impose significant restrictions on the ability of wh膩nau with gang connections to continue associating with each other as a family", and increase the risk of someone being held criminally liable for someone else's insignia.
It noted that even with its proposed modification, 鈥淣ew Zealand will still have a more comprehensive insignia ban than any Australian jurisdiction.鈥
Paul Goldsmith said officials present ministers with all manner of potential risks and outcomes.
He says the legislation puts the interests of the general public first, to be able to go about their daily lives without fear or intimidation from gang members.
鈥淚t's very easy to avoid, just don't flout the law three times within five years. That is the final backstop to deal with recalcitrant people who are flouting the law.鈥
Labour鈥檚 Justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said it is extraordinary the Minister has put something into the bill 鈥渁t the last minute, against all advice鈥.
鈥淭he question is, what's the harm of a gang patch in someone's cupboard or top drawer -- and the answer is absolutely none.鈥
Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you
Get the iHeart App
Get more of the radio, music and podcasts you love with the FREE iHeartRadio app. Scan the QR code to download now.
Download from the app stores
Stream unlimited music, thousands of radio stations and podcasts all in one app. iHeartRadio is easy to use and all FREE