九一星空无限

ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Up next
ZB

Judge rules young girl, 8, should visit killer dad behind bars

Author
Kurt Bayer, NZ Herald,
Publish Date
Thu, 27 Apr 2023, 12:01pm
Photo / 九一星空无限
Photo / 九一星空无限

Judge rules young girl, 8, should visit killer dad behind bars

Author
Kurt Bayer, NZ Herald,
Publish Date
Thu, 27 Apr 2023, 12:01pm

A Family Court judge has ruled that an 8-year-old girl should begin monthly visits to her father inside a maximum-security prison where he is serving a life sentence for murder.

Statutory rules governing Family Court reporting mean the聽Herald聽cannot identify any of the parties involved.

However, a judge鈥檚 decision, obtained by the聽Herald, outlines the case in full, and explains how the young child will be going behind bars to see her biological father.

The court heard that the girl鈥檚 father is currently serving a life sentence with a high minimum non-parole period after pleading guilty to murder.

Details of the murder cannot be reported but it involved a high level of violence.

The girl鈥檚 mother did not know of the man鈥檚 arrest and remand in custody for about six weeks.

Later, when she found out about his predicament, and his gang connections, she was concerned for both her and her daughter鈥檚 safety and stopped contact.

The girl鈥檚 mother later negotiated interim contact arrangements with the father鈥檚 close family members while the girl lived under her fulltime day-to-day care.

Supervised monthly visits with her grandmother at a contact centre were arranged but funding ran out shortly before the court hearing.

The grandmother applied for a parenting order seeking contact with the child every second weekend, which was opposed by the mother.

The father also sought contact, by telephone and audio visual link (AVL) from prison, and then in-person visits when Covid-19 restrictions allowed.

鈥淗e recognised it was not easy but said he did not want [his daughter] to forget him, and he wanted her to know that her father loves and cares about her,鈥 the Family Court ruling says.

The mother said she was worried about her daughter going into prison but said she would facilitate visits only if she wanted to see her father.

After a two-day hearing late last year, the parties and their lawyers reached an agreement about most aspects of the girl鈥檚 future contact with her paternal family.

The contact with her paternal family will gradually progress over three stages, starting with three-hour Sunday visits with her grandmother and the father able to write letters to her daughter who will be 鈥渆ncouraged to respond鈥.

Stage two will kick in after three months when monthly contact visits will increase to four hours and the father can make phone or video calls to his daughter.

Stage three sees six-hour Sunday grandmother visits 鈥 and also trips to see her dad in prison.

The court heard the child鈥檚 mother was 鈥渦nderstandably worried鈥 about the jail visits and reservations about her relationship with the man given he is serving a life sentence for murder.

鈥淪everal times she referenced the violence from him that she experienced in their relationship and her feeling she hadn鈥檛 been listened to in the proceedings leading up to the temporary protection order being discharged and the shared parenting order being made by consent,鈥 says the Family Court decision released last month.

She said her daughter鈥檚 phone calls with her father were 鈥渦psetting鈥 for the child who began having nightmares about him in prison.

A psychologist report by a clinical and forensic psychiatrist who is currently involved in 10 cases where a parent is in prison acknowledged children鈥檚 natural fear of prison 鈥渂ecause they are generally told that prison is a bad place and bad people go to prison鈥.

The judge said the child鈥檚 continued relationship with her father, and her family group, will be 鈥減reserved and strengthened鈥 if she can visit him in prison.

鈥淢y decision is that it is in her welfare and best interests for her to regularly visit her father in prison together with her stepmother [suppressed] and her siblings [also suppressed],鈥 the judge ruled.

The judge said that while it is important for children to know their views are important and will be considered, 鈥渋t is the adults who must decide their care arrangements,鈥 they said.

鈥淚t is unfair to place the heavy weight of responsibility on children, requiring them to make what are essentially parental decisions that the adults should be making.鈥

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you