九一星空无限

ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Up next
ZB

Scientists, staff call on minister to intervene in Callaghan Innovation restructure

Author
Jamie Morton,
Publish Date
Sun, 7 Apr 2024, 1:08pm
Lower Hutt-based Callaghan Innovation employs around 382 people, including around 200 scientists and others who wrangle grants and connect businesses with researchers.
Lower Hutt-based Callaghan Innovation employs around 382 people, including around 200 scientists and others who wrangle grants and connect businesses with researchers.

Scientists, staff call on minister to intervene in Callaghan Innovation restructure

Author
Jamie Morton,
Publish Date
Sun, 7 Apr 2024, 1:08pm

Staff at one of New Zealand鈥檚 largest research organisations have called on Judith Collins to step in over a wave of job cuts expected to be announced tomorrow.

But there鈥檚 no sign the Research, Science and Innovation Minister will intervene in Callaghan Innovation鈥檚 鈥渟trategic reset鈥, which staff fear will lead to a 鈥渟ubstantial number鈥 of science and engineer roles going.

The Herald understands details of the restructure, which went before the Crown agency鈥檚 board last week, will be shared with staff in meetings on Monday.

Lower Hutt-based Callaghan employs around 382 people, including around 200 scientists and others who wrangle grants and connect businesses with researchers.

The Government has asked agencies to cut 6.5 per cent to 7.5 per cent of their costs in a bid to slash overall public service spending by $1.5 billion per year.

Callaghan grants are administered by its monitoring agency, the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE), which falls in the 7.5 per cent camp, but Callaghan, which has an annual budget of $187 million, has so far not confirmed any savings target.

In a bluntly-written letter to Collins, supported by nearly 90 engineers, scientists and support workers at Callaghan, staff said they were 鈥渉ugely concerned鈥 over the reset, which they described as a 鈥済enuine risk鈥 to the future of science at the agency.

They worried many jobs could go this year and that those remaining would have to focus on commercial revenue 鈥渁t the effective exclusion of all else鈥.

鈥淭here will be narrower expertise and fewer research teams to carry our overhead costs,鈥 they said.

鈥淲e do not see this as a change to a new sustainable science organisation, but rather a first step that will lead to inevitable decline.鈥

The staffers said the restructure would make it harder to attract and retain staff and for the agency to meet its goals of generating new high-tech businesses.

鈥淲e call on the minister to ensure that people are retained in the system, and to save this sector of our science capability from being lost to New Zealand for a generation.鈥

Collins鈥 office said in a statement that the minister had seen the letter but considered the matter 鈥渙perational鈥 and referred the Herald to Callaghan for comment.

Callaghan Innovation chief executive Stefan Korn.
Callaghan Innovation chief executive Stefan Korn.

Callaghan chief executive Stefan Korn said the purpose of the reset was to return the agency to its 鈥渙riginal function鈥 of delivering commercial science, engineering and innovation support for industry.

鈥淚n the immediate and medium term, we need to ensure that Callaghan Innovation is able to deliver its services while ensuring we operate safely and within our existing fiscal envelope.鈥

Korn said Callaghan鈥檚 board and senior leadership were 鈥渁cutely aware this is a particularly difficult time for many of our people and we are focused on completing the consultation process so that we can give clarity as soon as possible to our people鈥.

The New Zealand Association of Scientists (NZAS) has shared its own worries over the reset.

鈥淸Callaghan is] a unique hub and these cuts will cause them to fall below a tipping point where they cease to be viable,鈥 co-president Dr Lucy Stewart said.

鈥淔rankly it appears they already have, but no one is willing to outright say that.鈥

NZAS co-president Professor Troy Baisden said Callaghan鈥檚 problems were 鈥渦nfortunately representative鈥 of what was happening in the wider research system.

New Zealand Association of Scientists president Professor Troy Baisden.
New Zealand Association of Scientists president Professor Troy Baisden.

鈥淲e now lack transparent understanding of what research is for and what capability will be lost without ongoing funding,鈥 Baisden said.

鈥淲e don鈥檛 know where important work is failing because it has half or a quarter of the funding it needs to succeed reliably.

鈥淭he current direction seems likely to be to defund many of these areas without transparent prioritisation.鈥

The association has already voiced concern over sector funding heading off a 鈥渇iscal cliff鈥, with the looming end of the country鈥檚 decade-old National Science Challenges and the scrapping of the former Government鈥檚 $450m 鈥淪cience City鈥 plan for Wellington.

That had involved creating three 鈥渟cience hubs鈥, one of which would have housed a new health and pandemic readiness research project involving Callaghan.

At this point, it鈥檚 not clear what will replace the science challenges, with the Government having also cancelled a major reform programme that was to have succeeded them.

Former chief science advisor Professor Sir Peter Gluckman has meanwhile been tasked with chairing separate groups advising on how the science and tertiary sectors can help boost the economy.

Jamie Morton is a specialist in science and environmental reporting. He joined the Herald in 2011 and writes about everything from conservation and climate change to natural hazards and new technology.

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you