九一星空无限

ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Up next
ZB

'Failures' and 'deficiencies': Security company, director guilty of misconduct

Author
Kelly Makiha, NZ Herald,
Publish Date
Wed, 28 Jun 2023, 8:44am
Tiny Deane has been found guilty of misconduct under the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010. Photo / File
Tiny Deane has been found guilty of misconduct under the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010. Photo / File

'Failures' and 'deficiencies': Security company, director guilty of misconduct

Author
Kelly Makiha, NZ Herald,
Publish Date
Wed, 28 Jun 2023, 8:44am

A security company that looks after emergency housing motels in Rotorua, and its sole director, have been found guilty of misconduct by a licensing authority.

Its findings included that Raymond Deane engaged two security guards - who he knew were linked to gangs - without proper licences and let them keep working after their licence applications were declined.

It also found Deane - locally known as Tiny Deane - had 鈥渄eficiencies鈥 in his management of security company Tigers Express Security Limited.

He and Tigers Express were found to have breached the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 and his 鈥渇ailures and misconduct鈥 meant he was 鈥渘ot suitable to be the managing director and sole officer of a security company鈥.

The findings are set out in a Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority decision released publicly on Monday.

The authority鈥檚 decision followed a complaint received in March 2022 under the Act.

Deane is chief executive officer of Visions of a Helping Hand, which has social service contracts with the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development to run emergency housing motels in Rotorua. He is also the sole director of Tigers Express Security Limited - a company that employs up to 50 security guards who work at the motels.

The decision said Deane did not think he needed a licence when he first started employing security guards under Visions as he understood they were 鈥渋n-house security鈥.

Once the ministry made it clear security guards needed to be employed by a security licence holder, Deane 鈥渋ncorporated Tigers Security and applied for a licence鈥.

鈥淗e advises Tigers Express was set up as an arm of Visions and therefore he thought it was appropriate for Visions to continue to employ the security guards even though the licence was held by Tigers Express.鈥

The ministry issued a directive in May 2022 that social service providers of emergency housing could not be security providers. Deane then separated the security company from Visions and changed its name to Tigers Express Security Limited.

The authority had to rule whether Tigers Express Security Limited breached the Act by trading as 鈥淭iger Security鈥.

It concluded that while Deane might not have acted intentionally, he was 鈥渘egligent鈥 and it raised questions about whether he was suitable to be managing director of a security company.

The decision said Deane accepted he made the decision to engage two security guards 鈥渒nowing they had gang affiliations鈥 and were not licensed. They were also employed by Visions for several months after their Certificates of Approval had been declined.

Deane told the authority鈥檚 investigators both security guards no longer worked in security after their certificates were declined, which was incorrect. The finding said he later 鈥渃hanged his story鈥 by saying he continued to employ one of them because he could see merit in him and he was a high performer.

The authority ruled Deane therefore intentionally breached the Act.

The authority needed to determine whether 鈥淭igers Security鈥 and Deane were a party to Visions providing security services without a security licence. It ruled Deane鈥檚 actions were either intentional or negligent.

It found Deane failed to understand or follow the contract he signed with the ministry and the clear advice given to him as to his responsibilities as an officer of a security licence holder. He also failed to take appropriate steps to understand his responsibilities as the manager of a security business.

The decision noted it was a concern that Deane was the sole company officer and manager of Tigers Express and also the chief executive of Visions.

鈥淭his is in conflict with [the ministry鈥檚] stated requirement for a clear separation between the social support services to clients and that of the security services.鈥

The decision noted emergency housing work was expanding 鈥渆xponentially鈥 in 2021 and it would have been difficult for Deane to keep up.

鈥淚t is incomprehensible given the pressures Mr Deane was under with a more than full-time job of being the chief executive of Visions that he took on another full-time role as managing director of a security company. That is particularly the case when the [ministry] contract specifically required a separation between the security work and the emergency housing and social work services,鈥 the decision said.

The decision said the pressure of running both businesses and the public scrutiny no doubt resulted in Deane鈥檚 mistakes.

鈥淔rom the time Tigers Express applied for a company security licence, Mr Deane has failed to understand and comply with all his responsibilities as a security business owner and manager. He either did not read or failed to comprehend the clear advice and guidelines with which he was provided.鈥

It found no evidence Deane consistently sought advice from agencies he believed to be experts as he claimed.

The decision said: 鈥淒eane鈥檚 failures and his misconduct are sufficient to establish that he is not suitable to be the managing director and sole officer of a security company.鈥

The decision said the security company was the only provider of security guards for Visions鈥 emergency housing motels and cancelling or suspending Tiger Express鈥 licence immediately would have serious consequences for staff and clients.

It, therefore, put off making a final decision on the appropriate penalty until after August 20 to allow Deane time to either rearrange, sell or contract out the security business currently run by Tigers Express.

It said it was likely to suspend or cancel the licence unless Deane could provide evidence he was no longer involved in managing its security work, among other conditions.

Deane鈥檚 bid to get name suppression failed.

Kelly Makiha is a senior journalist who has reported for the Rotorua Daily Post for more than 25 years, covering mainly police, court, human interest and social issues.

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you