
A woman who was 16 when she was by an Auckland youth worker is furious he has avoided jail to return to his family in Melbourne - after he claimed in court he had a job there with the Uniting Church.
However, the church denies hiring Australian man Fale McCarthy, 39, who has been convicted of indecent assault against two women in 2014.
He was sentenced in Auckland District Court last week after a trial in July last year.
One of McCarthy鈥檚 victims has spoken to the Herald about the impact of McCarthy鈥檚 offending on her in which he sucked her toes in exchange for money as part of a 鈥渞use to take advantage of [her] vulnerability鈥.
The victim claims far more serious allegations against McCarthy never made it to court.
鈥淚 believe I tried everything within my control to fight against this monster and if the system couldn鈥檛 hear the fight, hurt and trauma behind all of it and give what was due... then I鈥檒l take the conviction because that鈥檚 a black mark for the rest of his life against his name,鈥 the woman, who has name suppression, said.
On February 26, Judge David Sharp sentenced McCarthy to nine months supervision, 100 hours of community work and $1000 emotional harm reparations to each of his victims.
McCarthy escaped jail or home detention by arguing he needed to reunite with his partner and child in Melbourne, Victoria, and he had been offered new employment as a youth worker with the Uniting Church.
But the Uniting Church in Australia has confirmed to the Herald they have no record of McCarthy having anything to do with the Victorian branch of the church.
鈥淚t is the Uniting Church鈥檚 policy that we would not employ anyone with a criminal conviction of sexual assault or any form of child sexual abuse,鈥 Uniting Church communications manager Karin Kleynhans said.
McCarthy admitted the charge of indecent assault against his 16-year-old victim in December 2014.
Before the assault, McCarthy asked the 16-year-old if her mother read her messages, to which she said 鈥榥o鈥.
Judge Sharp said this reflected a degree of 鈥減remeditation鈥 in the offending.
鈥淵ou told her you had a bet with other friends whereby the first person to film themselves sucking another person鈥檚 toes would win the pot [of money],鈥 Judge Sharp described in court.
鈥淪he agreed because she wanted money as promised by yourself. You took her into her older brother鈥檚 room, took off her shoes and socks and begun to suck her toes for around three minutes.
鈥淭hen you hugged her from behind and said 鈥榯hank you鈥.鈥
His victim has described McCarthy as 鈥渆xtremely dangerous鈥 and a 鈥減redator鈥 who demonstrated no remorse in his attempts to obtain a discharge without conviction.
She cites the multiple allegations against McCarthy that did not become charges as evidence of much more widespread offending.
鈥淭wenty-two women went to the police but because he operated in the 鈥榞rey鈥 areas of sexual/indecent assault, many of the testimonies were inadmissible which was incredibly heartbreaking,鈥 she claimed.
McCarthy was also convicted of another indecent assault in July 2014 against another woman - a charge he did not plead guilty to.
McCarthy was out drinking with a group of people and got in a car with the victim who was 鈥渉eavily intoxicated鈥 and two others.
The woman fell asleep and woke up about 15 minutes later with her head on McCarthy鈥檚 lap.
McCarthy moved his hand up the woman鈥檚 bare thigh under her skirt and 鈥渟queezed just short of the bottom鈥 and then moved his hand and began to stick his fingers beneath her underwear and 鈥渁ttempted to touch [the woman鈥檚] bare genitalia鈥.
McCarthy also has a history of working with youth in New Zealand.
His LinkedIn professional profile online describes him as a youth worker at Crosspower Ministries Trust.
However, the charities register says Crosspower Ministries Trust was disestablished in 2017, and the link to its website is no longer valid.
He has also been involved with a competitive youth dance group.
In a is identified as a coach in Streetdance NZ - a group heading to a hip-hop dance world championship in Las Vegas.
McCarthy is also a DJ, with several tracks on a Soundcloud profile online.
Defence lawyer Rasyad Ismail argued that McCarthy should avoid home detention or a jail sentence because he has 鈥渓argely lived in Australia鈥 and would be unable to return to his partner, who he has recently reunited with, and his child in Melbourne.
McCarthy initially faced several other charges for historic sexual offending against women in Auckland - some of which did not go to trial.
Ismail argued McCarthy should be given a discharge without conviction. Both victims opposed this.
鈥淚f convicted today, Mr McCathy鈥檚 life, as he knows it, is over,鈥 Ismail said.
鈥淭here is a real and appreciable risk that he will not be able to reunite with his son and partner in Australia, that both of them will be left in the lurch in so far as any potential financial assistance.
鈥淗e may be able to provide in Australia as a person that鈥檚 going to be gainfully employed.鈥
Ismail said that since McCarthy鈥檚 last sworn affidavit, he had been offered employment by the Uniting Church as a youth engagement lead dealing with at-risk youth in the Melbourne district.
Judge Sharp described this development as 鈥渄ouble edged鈥 with McCarthy being in a position of responsibility with younger people and these offences include him taking advantage of youth in one case.
鈥淭here is a school of thought that the people who hired him need to know this aspect of his character exists,鈥 Sharp said.
Ismail said the Uniting Church was aware of McCarthy鈥檚 offending but no proof could be supplied to Judge Sharp.
When the Herald subsequently presented the statement from the Uniting Church of Australia that they had no knowledge of McCarthy being employed with them, Ismail opposed the publication of these details because: 鈥渋n the absence of any formal investigation/findings [it] would be pre-empting the outcome and may be incongruent with the administration of justice鈥.
Crown prosecutor in the case, Daniel Becker, referred the matter to police for investigation.
Judge Sharp acknowledged McCarthy鈥檚 sentence would have a starting point of 12 months imprisonment.
鈥淭he offending was sexually motivated, gratuitous, has had a significant impact on the victims. The offending has had skin on skin contact,鈥 he said.
Sharp said McCarthy was entitled to a reduction due to his lack of convictions, and guilty plea on one of the charges. These reductions took into account the 鈥渋mpact of the need for you to be in New Zealand鈥 which jail or home detention would inflict.
While disheartened by the level of McCarthy鈥檚 sentence, his victim expressed relief after many years of struggle.
鈥淚鈥檓 one to count my blessings and be grateful for what is out of my control,鈥 she said.
鈥淚 would鈥檝e hoped for at least home detention, but the fact that he quite possibly could return to Melbourne to work in the industry that he does, with vulnerable women and youth, is incredibly disappointing.
But she said the sentence 鈥渁s small and lacklustre as it was, was still a win in my eyes鈥 due to the accompanying criminal conviction.
Tom Dillane is an Auckland-based journalist covering local government and crime as well as sports investigations. He joined the Herald in 2018 and is deputy head of news.
Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you
Get the iHeart App
Get more of the radio, music and podcasts you love with the FREE iHeartRadio app. Scan the QR code to download now.
Download from the app stores
Stream unlimited music, thousands of radio stations and podcasts all in one app. iHeartRadio is easy to use and all FREE