九一星空无限

ZB ZB
Opinion
Live now
Start time
Playing for
End time
Listen live
Up next
ZB

Nats MP stripped of portfolios for 'threatening' Labour member

Author
Michael Neilson,
Publish Date
Thu, 24 Aug 2023, 2:04pm

Nats MP stripped of portfolios for 'threatening' Labour member

Author
Michael Neilson,
Publish Date
Thu, 24 Aug 2023, 2:04pm

National MP Tim van de Molen has been stripped of all portfolios after he was found to have acted in contempt of Parliament, with a recommendation he be censured for 鈥渁cting in a threatening manner鈥 towards Labour MP Shanan Halbert.

It comes after Labour鈥檚 Rachel Boyack complained about van de Molen鈥檚 conduct towards Halbert as chairman of the Transport and Industrial Relations Committee on June 29.

The matter related to an exchange between van de Molen and Halbert after the committee wrapped up for the day. where Van de Molen raised his concerns about the lack of questions he was being allocated.

He allegedly stood over Halbert in a threatening way, causing other MPs to gather around Halbert out of concern for his safety - van de Molen has disputed this aspect.

Halbert said he sought to resolve the issue there and at later meetings, but van de Molen wouldn鈥檛 accept there was any issue with his behaviour.

Halbert said he even wrote to the National Party whips - Chris Penk senior and Maureen Pugh junior - but they also would not acknowledge there had been any incident.

Speaker Adrian Rurawhe referred Boyack鈥檚 complaint to the Privileges Committee for consideration.

In a unanimous decision released today, the committee - with MPs from Labour, National and the Green Party - found van de Molen鈥檚 actions to have been in contempt of the House.

聽鈥淲e find that Mr van de Molen鈥檚 conduct towards Mr Halbert amounted to threatening him, that Mr Halbert was impeded in the discharge of his duties as a member, and that in doing so, Mr van de Molen committed a contempt of the House,鈥 the report said.

The committee said acting in a 鈥渢hreatening manner toward a member of Parliament on account of their conduct in Parliament, and particularly for their conduct as a presiding officer, is a serious matter.

鈥淲e therefore recommend that Mr van de Molen be censured by the House for threatening a member on account of their conduct as a presiding officer and impeding them in the discharge of their duties as a member.鈥

Labour Party MP for Northcote Shanan Halbert. Photo / Mark Mitchell

Labour Party MP for Northcote Shanan Halbert. Photo / Mark Mitchell

Van de Molen made a public apology in the House today during Question Time, addressing Halbert directly.

An independent review of the complaint found that van de Molen鈥檚 conduct 鈥渁s a whole was aggressive in the sense of being hostile, unprofessional and with an element that was objectively threatening, but not in the sense of physical violence鈥.

The reviewer also reported that his conduct 鈥渃aused discomfort for all three of the Parliamentary staff who were present at the time and each considered the need to ring for security.

鈥淣one of them described a more enduring impact.鈥

Halbert said van de Molen鈥檚 behaviour was 鈥渞eally intimidating鈥.

鈥淎t the time I was seated and Tim was standing. But I鈥檝e accepted his apology, and I will work with him in the future.

鈥淭here鈥檚 no place for that sort of behaviour for threatening behaviour or intimidation in Parliament. It鈥檚 not just about myself. It鈥檚 about my colleagues that were in the room, and particularly the staff and the team of clerks at the time.鈥

Halbert said sought to acknowledge the incident with van de Molen and then through the party whips they wouldn鈥檛 acknowledge there were any issues.

鈥淎s a junior whip should an incident come about my one of my team members, I would act on that and ensure that the incident was resolved as quickly as possible. And that鈥檚 not what happened.

鈥淚 think the National Party certainly should have looked into it further at the time, understood if there was an incident and resolved it immediately given staff were in the room at the time.鈥

National Party leader Christopher Luxon said following the decision van de Molen had been stood down from his portfolios, which included spokesman for Building and Construction, Defence and Veterans, and ACC.

鈥淭im鈥檚 behaviour is not up to the standards I expect of National MPs,鈥 said Luxon.

He expected 鈥渉igh standards鈥 and would hold his team to them.

Van de Molen, who last year had a horrific chainsaw accident that saw him break his neck, back and both arms, has had a 鈥渄ifficult year鈥, but this was no excuse for his behaviour, Luxon said.

鈥淭im accepts all the findings and has publicly apologised. He has also committed to seeking coaching support to ensure this doesn鈥檛 happen again.

鈥淓veryone makes mistakes, and there is a path back for Tim 鈥 provided he can demonstrate to me, the wider National caucus, and himself, that he has learnt from this incident and grown as a result.鈥

The committee found his conduct could not be condoned as normal or acceptable.

鈥淲e accept that he considers he did not intend to threaten or intimidate Mr Halbert.

鈥淏ut the combination of factors in this incident鈥擬r van de Molen鈥檚 physical positioning, his words, tone, and failure to move aside when asked 鈥 justify a finding that his conduct was objectively threatening.

鈥淭here was an objectively threatening element to Mr van de Molen鈥檚 behaviour in standing near Mr Halbert and telling him to 鈥榮tand up鈥 and in not moving when asked to, to enable Mr Halbert to leave.鈥

Take your Radio, Podcasts and Music with you